
A Global Alliance Poised to Reshape the World Order
Apr 21
5 min read

A shift is underway—one that threatens to upend the global economic and geopolitical landscape. A coalition of nations, originally formed as a counterweight to Western dominance, is swelling in size and ambition. As of 2025, 44 countries, representing a staggering diversity of economies and ideologies, have signaled their intent to join this alliance, with 23 formally applying and 21 expressing informal interest. This is no mere economic pact; it’s a bold gambit to rewrite the rules of global trade, power, and influence. The implications are profound, the stakes are astronomical, and the world may never be the same.
A Brief History:
The alliance began in 2009 as a modest grouping of five emerging economies, united by a shared frustration with a global financial system they viewed as rigged in favor of the West. Initially, it was a symbolic gesture—a loose coalition of nations representing over 40% of the world’s population and a significant chunk of global GDP. Over time, it evolved from a talking shop into a formidable bloc, adding new members and expanding its scope. By 2023, the group had grown to include major energy producers and consumers, and by 2025, it welcomed a Southeast Asian giant as its first member from that region, signaling its broadening appeal.
The bloc’s rise has been fueled by a potent mix of economic ambition and geopolitical resentment. Many of its members face sanctions or trade barriers from Western powers, pushing them to seek alternatives to the dominant financial systems. The alliance’s promise of trade in local currencies, bypassing the U.S. dollar, has proven irresistible to nations eager to escape the stranglehold of Western-dominated institutions like the IMF and SWIFT. This vision of “de-dollarization” isn’t just economic—it’s a rebellion against the world order.
The Shocking Scale of Expansion
The announcement that 44 countries are poised to join the alliance in 2025 is a bombshell. These nations span continents—Asia, Africa, Latin America, and even parts of Europe—representing a kaleidoscope of political systems, from democracies to autocracies. Among them are resource-rich African nations, heavily sanctioned Middle Eastern states, and fast-growing Southeast Asian economies. One African country, for instance, is aggressively pursuing membership to bolster its socioeconomic growth, while a Southeast Asian powerhouse sees the bloc as a vehicle for energy and food security.
This isn’t just a numbers game. The collective weight of these countries—46% of the world’s population and 35.6% of global GDP in purchasing power parity—gives the alliance unprecedented clout. If even half of the aspiring members join, the bloc could control a multilateral lender, rivaling the World Bank, and dictate terms in global trade negotiations. The sheer diversity of the group, however, is both its strength and its Achilles’ heel. Can a bloc this varied agree on anything beyond a shared disdain for Western hegemony?
A Financial Earthquake
At the heart of the alliance’s agenda is a radical idea: dismantling the U.S. dollar’s dominance. For decades, the dollar has been the world’s reserve currency, underpinning global trade and giving the U.S. unparalleled economic leverage. The bloc’s push for “de-dollarization” seeks to end this by promoting trade in local currencies and developing alternative payment systems. In 2025, the alliance is testing a gold-backed settlement currency and exploring a blockchain-based platform to bypass Western-controlled financial networks.
The implications are staggering. If successful, de-dollarization could weaken the U.S. economy, disrupt global markets, and shift financial power eastward. A world where oil trades in yuan or rupees instead of dollars, or where sanctions lose their bite because targeted nations can trade freely within the bloc. Already, some members are settling oil trades in new currencies, and non-members can access the alliance’s payment system, amplifying its reach.
But the road is not smooth. The dollar’s dominance is entrenched—despite the bloc’s efforts, it remains in high demand, and no single currency has emerged as a viable replacement. The alliance’s payment platform, touted as a game-changer, has yet to make a significant dent. Moreover, the group’s diversity complicates consensus; some members, like a major South Asian democracy, are wary of fully abandoning the dollar, valuing their ties with the West.
Geopolitical Firestorm:
The alliance’s ambitions have not gone unnoticed. In a series of fiery statements, a prominent Western leader has threatened 100% tariffs on bloc members if they undermine the dollar. This isn’t an idle threat—such tariffs could cripple export-dependent economies within the alliance, sparking a trade war that reverberates globally. The leader’s rhetoric, posted on social media, paints the bloc as a direct challenge to Western economic supremacy, warning that any attempt to replace the dollar will lead to “goodbye to selling in the U.S.”
This standoff is a geopolitical powder keg. The bloc’s expansion, particularly its inclusion of sanctioned nations, has already drawn Western ire. Some members, like a major Eastern power, see the alliance as a shield against sanctions, while others view it as a platform to project influence. The upcoming summit in a South American city in July 2025 will be a crucible, where the bloc must navigate internal divisions and external pressures to chart its future.
The Human and Environmental Angle
Beyond economics, the alliance is positioning itself as a champion of global challenges. One member has urged the bloc to mobilize $1.3 trillion annually by 2035 to combat climate change, emphasizing collective action on issues like desertification and biodiversity loss. Initiatives like a global big cat conservation alliance and a biofuel coalition highlight the bloc’s softer side, appealing to nations desperate for sustainable development.
Yet, some members prioritize industrial growth over environmental goals, and the bloc’s consensus-driven decision-making could stall progress. Moreover, the alliance’s focus on sovereignty and non-interference clashes with Western-led human rights frameworks, raising questions about its moral compass. Will it become a haven for regimes seeking to dodge accountability, or a genuine force for equitable development?
New World Order?
The alliance’s trajectory hinges on its ability to balance ambition with cohesion. If it succeeds in integrating its 44 aspiring members, it could reshape global governance, creating a multipolar world where no single power holds sway. A successful payment system and a unified trade bloc could accelerate de-dollarization, weakening Western influence and empowering emerging economies.
But the risks are immense. Internal divisions—between sanction-hit nations and those with Western ties—could fracture the bloc. A major South Asian member, for instance, has dismissed a common currency while praising the dollar, signaling unease with the alliance’s more radical goals. External threats, like tariffs or sanctions, could deter new members, and the lack of a unified military or economic strategy limits the bloc’s ability to rival NATO or ASEAN.
The economic fallout could be catastrophic. A botched de-dollarization effort might trigger market chaos, while a trade war could devastate global supply chains, hitting semiconductors and energy markets hardest. Developing nations, lured by the bloc’s promises, might find themselves caught in a geopolitical crossfire, their economies battered by retaliatory tariffs or currency volatility.
A Global Awakening?
Perhaps the most shocking aspect is the alliance’s potential to ignite a global awakening. By challenging Western dominance, it’s forcing a reckoning with uncomfortable truths: the inequities of the current financial system, the weaponization of sanctions, and the fragility of a dollar-dependent world. Even if the bloc fails, its very existence plants a seed—could a fairer, multipolar world emerge from this chaos?
The summit in July 2025 will be a turning point. Will the alliance forge a bold new path, or crumble under its own contradictions? One thing is certain: the world is watching, and the stakes couldn’t be higher. This isn’t just a story of economics or politics—it’s a saga of power, rebellion, and the audacious attempt for a new global order.