The White House’s AI Action Plan: America’s Quest for Global Tech Supremacy

The White House’s AI Action Plan: America’s Quest for Global Tech Supremacy

A Moonshot for AI Dominance

The U.S. wants to “win the AI race” and cement its spot as the global tech titan, outpacing rivals like China. The plan, born from Executive Order 14179 signed in January 2025, frames AI as the key to economic prosperity, national security, and human flourishing. It’s built on three pillars: Accelerating AI Innovation, Building American AI Infrastructure, and Leading in International AI Diplomacy and Security. But this isn’t just about tech, it’s also about setting global standards, controlling the narrative, and ensuring American AI runs the show, from Mumbai’s data centers to Tokyo’s startups.

AI isn’t just about chatbots or self-driving cars, it’s the backbone of the next industrial revolution. The plan compares it to the 1960s space race, where the winner didn’t just get bragging rights but shaped global tech standards. The U.S. sees AI as a geopolitical move: dominate AI, and you dominate markets, militaries, and minds. With China’s aggressive AI investments since 2017, the stakes are brutally important. The U.S. isn’t just playing catch-up; it’s aiming to lap the competition.

Radical Deregulation:

The plan yeets Biden-era regulations like Executive Order 14110 into the trash, calling them “barriers” to innovation. The goal? Give Big Tech and startups free rein to build, experiment, and scale without government red tape. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) is tasked with sniffing out any rules that “unnecessarily hinder AI development,” while the Federal Trade Commission is reviewing past investigations to ensure they don’t stifle innovation.

What’s not making till the headlines? The deregulation push could spark a Wild West vibe in AI development. Without guardrails, we might see a flood of AI tools, some brilliant, some sketchy. Critics, including a coalition of 90+ labor unions and consumer groups, are sounding alarms, saying this hands Big Tech a blank check while sidelining public welfare. Nurses, for instance, worry about untested AI in healthcare, fearing patients could become “guinea pigs” for profit-driven tech. The plan’s silence on ethical oversight is deafening, could this lead to AI systems that prioritize profit over safety?

Open-Source AI: The Global Game-Changer

The U.S. is doubling down on open-source and “open-weight” AI models, like freely available code that anyone can tweak, from indie developers in Lagos to academics in London. The plan calls for a “supportive environment” for these models, with the National Science Foundation’s AI Research Resource pilot partnering with tech giants to give startups and researchers access to big-league computing power.

Open-source AI could democratize tech, letting small players compete with the Googles and Microsofts of the world. But here’s the tea nobody’s spilling: open-source models are a geopolitical weapon. By exporting American open-source AI, the U.S. aims to set global standards, embedding its values (and tech) into the world’s AI ecosystem. The catch? Open-source models are harder to regulate, and bad actors could exploit them for misinformation or cyberattacks. The plan’s vague on how it’ll balance openness with security, something to watch.

Infrastructure Overdrive: Data Centers, Power, and Jobs

AI needs juice, lots of it. The plan calls for a massive buildout of data centers, streamlined permitting for semiconductor factories, and a beefed-up power grid to handle AI’s energy demands. Federal lands could become AI hubs, and the Department of Energy is on deck to tackle the “national energy emergency” caused by AI’s thirst for power.

The Deets You Didn’t Hear

AI’s energy consumption is bonkers. Data centers could push U.S. energy demand up by 20% by 2030, and the plan’s push for rapid approvals might sidestep environmental reviews. Small towns near proposed data centers are already grumbling about noise, water usage, and land grabs. Plus, the labor market angle is a mixed bag, while the plan promises jobs in construction and tech, automation could displace workers in sectors like manufacturing and retail. The real question: will these jobs benefit everyday Americans or just tech elites?

Freezing Out “Restrictive” States

In a bold move, the plan says no federal AI funding for states with “burdensome” AI regulations. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) will monitor state laws to ensure they don’t clash with federal goals. Translation? If your state’s AI rules are too tight, you’re cut off from the cash flow.

The Under-the-Radar Drama

This is a power play against blue states like California, where strict AI laws are brewing. The plan’s language about “not interfering with states’ rights” feels like lip service, federal funding is a big stick, and the White House isn’t afraid to swing it. This could spark legal battles, with states arguing the feds are overstepping. For businesses, it’s a signal: set up shop in deregulated states to tap into federal goodies.

Global Export and Diplomacy: America’s AI Empire

The plan’s got a swaggering global vision: export “full-stack” American AI packages (hardware, software, models) to allies while locking out adversaries like China. The Commerce and State Departments are teaming up to create an American AI Exports Program, launching by October 2025. The Economic Diplomacy Action Group will sweeten the deal with federal financing for allies buying U.S. tech.

Again, this isn’t just about selling tech, it’s about cultural and economic dominance. By pushing American AI, the U.S. wants to shape how the world uses AI, from healthcare in Brazil to finance in Singapore. But there’s a shadow side: the plan’s focus on analyzing Chinese AI for “CCP propaganda” hints at a new digital Cold War. Export controls on AI chips and software could escalate tensions, and allies might bristle at being nudged into Team USA’s tech ecosystem. Plus, the plan’s light on how it’ll handle data privacy for global users, another potential landmine.

Labor and National Security: Jobs and Tanks

The plan promises AI-driven job creation, especially in infrastructure, and a beefy role for AI in the Department of Defense. AI-powered drones, cybersecurity, and maybe even autonomous weapons. It’s all framed as a win for economic competitiveness and national security.

The Unseen Risks

Here’s the 411: AI in defense is a Pandora’s box. Advanced systems could revolutionize warfare but also raise ethical red flags, think autonomous drones making life-or-death calls. The labor market’s a gamble too. While the plan touts job creation, AI could automate millions of jobs globally, hitting low-skill workers hardest. In India, for example, call center jobs are already shrinking due to AI chatbots. The U.S. needs a plan to retrain workers, but the Action Plan’s mum on that.

Ideology-Free AI: The “Not Woke” Agenda

The plan’s obsessed with “objective” AI, free from “ideological biases or social agendas.” It directs federal procurement to favor AI models that are “truthful” and “ideologically neutral,” with the OMB issuing guidelines by November 2025 to enforce this.

The Real Talk

This is a not-so-subtle jab at “woke” AI, think models trained to avoid sensitive topics or promote diversity. The plan’s push for “truthful” AI sounds noble but dodges a messy truth: defining “truth” is a minefield. This could lead to censorship or bias in the other direction, especially if the government gets to pick winners. The plan’s also quiet on how it’ll measure “neutrality”, a recipe for controversy.

What Happens Next?

The AI Action Plan is a rocket booster for U.S. tech, but it’s not a smooth ride. By 2027, expect a surge in U.S. AI startups, fueled by deregulation and open-source models. Data center construction will boom, creating thousands of jobs but also straining local grids and communities. Globally, American AI exports will dominate in allied nations, but China’s counter-moves, like its own open-source push, could spark a tech arms race. National security applications will accelerate, with AI-driven defense tech raising ethical debates. For businesses, the plan’s a green light to innovate, but startups in restrictive states might struggle. For workers, it’s a double-edged sword: new tech jobs will emerge, but automation could hit hard without retraining programs.

Call for Sponsors

If you’re vibing with this AI revolution, that’s awesome, keep slaying! But if you’re worried about what this means for our daily lives, from jobs to privacy, let’s dig deeper together. Want to fuel investigations into the real impact of AI?

Sponsor our next exposé to uncover the insights and spark the convos that matter.

Hit us up at thebrink2028@gmail.com to make it happen!

A huge shoutout to Diego Morales from Buenos Aires, Argentina, for sponsoring this article! Diego, a cybersecurity analyst and whistleblower advocate, funded this piece to expose the hidden risks of unchecked AI development, believing that truth in tech can protect communities from corporate overreach.